Kambda nearshore engineers use GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codex and Claude Code as standard tools and can build the LLM-powered features your SaaS roadmap now requires. Same time zone. Senior level. Onboard in 10 days.
Kambda is a Costa Rica-based nearshore software development company working with senior engineering talent across Latin America.
AI tooling accelerates how we code. LLM feature engineering puts AI inside your product.
Toggle between a traditional nearshore team and a Kambda AI-augmented team on common engineering tasks.
Common LLM feature requests from engineering teams in our ICP and the exact work Kambda engineers handle.
What changes when your nearshore team works with AI tooling by default and can build AI features, not just consume them.
| Traditional Nearshore | Kambda AI-Augmented | |
|---|---|---|
| Uses AI coding tools daily | Varies / optional | Standard on every engagement |
| Can build LLM-powered features | Rarely included | Core capability |
| Sprint throughput vs. comparable seniority | Baseline | 2 to 4x higher on common tasks |
| Test coverage on deliverables | Often skipped or minimal | AI-generated test suites as standard |
| Time zone overlap with US | Varies by region | Full CST overlap, year-round |
| Onboarding time | 2 to 6 weeks typical | 5 to 10 business days |
| RAG / vector search experience | Not standard | Available on request |
| Code documentation quality | Inconsistent | AI-assisted inline docs |
Getting started with an AI-augmented Kambda team follows the same engagement model as our standard work, just faster than any US hire.
It is standard practice, not a pitch. Kambda engineers use GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code on every engagement. Before placement we confirm that a candidate is actively using these tools, not just claiming familiarity.
Both. Using Copilot is about how we code. Building RAG pipelines, chatbots, document AI, or semantic search is about what we build. Kambda has engineers with hands-on experience in both.
No. Kambda engineers integrate into your existing workflow, sprints, review process, and tooling. The AI tooling lives on the developer side. You notice the output, not the process overhead.
Our engineers have production experience with OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini, plus Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, pgvector, LangChain, and LlamaIndex where relevant.
The engagement model and pricing structure stays the same: from $30 per hour per developer, with the final rate depending on seniority and stack. AI tooling licenses are included in the engagement.